No, I think that title is incorrect. I think it’s
the History classes that have failed us. They have certainly failed me. All the
recent Presidential election craziness got me thinking about past Presidents
and what they did or did not accomplish during their tenure in the White House.
And I’ve discovered I know very little in that field.
That got me thinking back to all the history
classes I had to take in school; Colorado history, Missouri history, US History (in
more than 1 grade) and World history. In all of those classes, ‘learning’
consisted of memorizing names, dates and places. I promptly forgot all of those
things as soon as the last test was done – they held no interest or perceived
value to me.
Another thing I remembered about these classes is
that they slogged through the 1600s, 1700s and first half of the 1800s. By the
time they got done with the Civil War, we had about 3 or 4 weeks left in the
school year, and we raced to get through to 1950. Even as a kid, I figured
those years that (almost) reached my birth date might have more bearing on my
immediate life than stuff that was 300 years old. But we raced through it so
quickly, I can’t say that with any certainty.
Personally, I don’t think making kids memorize
names, dates and places really teaches them anything. What do I remember of
history? The tiny bits and pieces of humanity that they accidentally let slip
into their lectures. Bits like the suffering of Washington’s troops, camped for the
winter in Valley
Forge,
freezing and without supplies.
I have always wanted some information that would
help me identify with people in history. What did the average family eat, wear,
do for entertainment, and how did this super-important event you want me to
remember change or influence their lives? Maybe then I would remember that
event; it might mean something to me.
Some teachers have been modifying their math
classes to make the problems more personal for individual students. Why can’t
history classes be more personal?
No comments:
Post a Comment