Like most US families these days,
money is a source of contention. All the bills keep going up, month after
month, year after year. My little family has been slowly sliding toward the
bottom of ‘Middle Class’ for over a decade. But on paper, it looks like we’re a
long way from poverty.
That got me punching keys on my calculator, trying
to figure out just what ‘poverty’ is. Politicians talk about people in poverty as
if poverty was a minor inconvenience.
So, let’s take a look at this. A family of four, I
heard recently, lived in poverty if their income was less than $23,000 a year.
A full-time job is 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year, so how hard could it be
for a family to make that much? Not that easy, it turns out, because a single
bread-winner would need to make $11.06 per hour.
The current federal minimum wage is $7.25. (This
is NOT the minimum in all states. However, NO
state has a minimum of $11.06.) A full time job at minimum wage only nets about
$18,000 a year.
I know what you’re going to say; the other parent
needs to get a job. That would push their income up to $36,000 a year. Good
point. But who says this family has a second parent?
And even if it does, who will care for the
children? 20 years ago, I was lucky to find a neighborhood woman who would
watch 2 children for only $100 a week. I’m sure they want more than that now.
If you want to take your children to a licensed day care, you will probably
pay every after-taxes penny made by that 2nd worker. What about
family values? Are you a firm believer that children are better off being
raised by a neighbor lady or a hired staff rather than their parents?
Another possibility is for the parents to work
opposing shifts, to eliminate child care. This might work once the kids are in
school, the night-shift parent could sleep during the day. But the parents
would hardly ever see each other. Is that family-friendly?
I have my thoughts on how this ‘inconvenience’
should be addressed. I haven’t lived in poverty, but I have been that 2nd
bread-winner, and I’ve been the 2nd bread-winner with 2 jobs when
the 1st bread-winner had 3. It should not be necessary for 1 family
of four to have that many jobs in order to put food on the table.
No comments:
Post a Comment